The response from the Studio to some assertions, apparently not reported properly, that unnecessarily frighten the sick by their belief that doctors respond only for serious misconduct ... inaccuracy, rather Marchiani, to which the lawyer. Nicola Todeschini replied.
In an article published on the Web nineteenth century, are in fact reproduced statements (which we were likely to be misinterpreted) by which "' is important to understand, and not always the people know that the responsibility of the physician is only required in case of gross negligence. " A
this statement is not legally correct, the lawyer of the Center for Study has thus responded by writing to the newspaper
In an article published on the Web nineteenth century, are in fact reproduced statements (which we were likely to be misinterpreted) by which "' is important to understand, and not always the people know that the responsibility of the physician is only required in case of gross negligence. " A
this statement is not legally correct, the lawyer of the Center for Study has thus responded by writing to the newspaper
Dear Editor, I have carefully read the piece reproduced below, which has been reported and which contains statements which, if faithfully report, deserve confutate.Dubitiamo fact that the lawyer has never been argued that " is important to understand, and not always the people know that the responsibility of the physician is only required in case of serious misconduct .>>. The statement, in fact, is not correct, rather they must be refuted outright. The limitation of liability to cases of serious misconduct, contained in art. 2236 cod. Civ., refers only to blame for lack of skill-and not to the negligence and imprudence, and much more frequent- the situations in which the doctor has found a fight cases of special difficulty, just in case, this, that the Court has assumed only in limited circumstances, we can thus state authoritatively that the norm is no longer an anchor for at least a decade sanitari.Nella of salvation for the most part, therefore, the medical and healthcare facilities are also responsible for negligence, Furthermore, it is precisely the latter, if accused of committing an error, but the demonstration had diligently fulfilled its performance, resulting in the sensitivity of soccombenti.Data vice versa, and the discomfort that patients suffering from malprassi not deserve, I suggest that this reply is published so that incorrect information and a source of misinformation can be replaced by those scientifically esatte.Conto about the seriousness of the newspaper and explain, if you can help, such advice is given not only by myself as a lawyer of the Center Study for the Defense of the Sick, but also a member of the Legal Research Group in Forensic Science, University of Siena www.scienzemedicolegali.it Pending feedback, because such a statement will be published also web portal www.difesamalato.it together with the piece containing the false statements and, hopefully, the next bear the clarification request, I extend best wishes.
Mr Nicola Todeschini
See also feeds www.difesamalato.it 
